Created attachment 1471565 [details] Screen shot from design Description of problem: We use a checkbox when a subscription requires virt-who to be setup, and a minus sign when it doesn't. In the original design the checkmark was bolder then the minus sign. However, in the current implementation they are of equal boldness. This makes it a little harder to decipher. The minus sign should probably not have much (if any) bolding. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 6.4.0 snap 14
Created attachment 1471566 [details] Screen shot from 6.4 snap 14 Atached screen shots for comparison
Created redmine issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/24517 from this bug
The Satellite Team is attempting to provide an accurate backlog of bugzilla requests which we feel will be resolved in the next few releases. We do not believe this bugzilla will meet that criteria, and have plans to close it out in 1 month. This is not a reflection on the validity of the request, but a reflection of the many priorities for the product. If you have any concerns about this, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support or your account team. If we do not hear from you, we will close this bug out. Thank you.
Upstream bug assigned to walden
PR: https://github.com/Katello/katello/pull/8444
Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite 6 since the upstream issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/24517 has been resolved.
Verified fix in Sat 6.7 snap 5 see attachment 1643355 [details] showing new design. - is no longer bolder.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:1454