Bug 161078 – Missing BuildRequires dependency on zlib-devel

Bug 161078 - Missing BuildRequires dependency on zlib-devel

Summary:	Missing BuildRequires dependency on zlib-devel

Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	openssl096b (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	4.0
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Tomas Mraz
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2005-06-20 10:16 EDT by Andreas Thienemann
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:07 EST (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-06-20 10:25:47 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Andreas Thienemann 2005-06-20 10:16:10 EDT

During a testbuild of openssl096b-0.9.6b-22.1 in mock, the rebuild process
stops with the following error:

+ gcc -o openssl-thread-test -I./include -O2 -g -pipe -m64 -Wa,--noexecstack
/builddir/build/SOURCES/openssl-thread-test.c lib
ssl.a libcrypto.a -lpthread -lz -ldl
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.86226 (%build)


Adding zlib-devel to the BuildRequires: list should fix this problem.
Note: This also seems to be an issue in rawhide.

Comment 1 Tomas Mraz 2005-06-20 10:25:47 EDT

I'm sorry but this isn't serious enough for RHEL-4 to fix.

The current openssl/openssl097a packages in rawhide and FC-4 are without this
problem.

There is no openssl096b package in FC-4 or rawhide.

Comment 2 Andreas Thienemann 2005-06-20 10:42:28 EDT

I was looking at
<http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/openssl096b/devel/openssl.spec?view=markup>,
which had the same problem.

But if it's not shipped anymore... who cares? ;)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.