In order to improve usability of packages in Fedora, project Man Page Scan was created and its task is to provide consistency of man pages (and documentation in general). The results are now available for package maintainers to fix documentation issues. If you need to re-run the check yourself, here is the simple process of man page check: 1. Download man-page-day from: https://pagure.io/ManualPageScan/blob/master/f/man-page-day.sh 2. Run the script: $ ./man-page-day.sh postfix
Created attachment 1473114 [details] Logs
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 29 development cycle. Changing version to '29'.
> [ [1m[31mError(B[m ] binary /usr/bin/rmail has no man page! > [ [1m[31mError(B[m ] binary /usr/bin/rmail.postfix has no man page! > No manual page exists. > [ [1m[32mOK(B[m ] binary /usr/sbin/sendmail has man page /usr/share/man/man8/sendmail.8.gz > [ [1m[33mWarn(B[m ] man page is in section 8. Only commands requiring admin privileges, or deamons should be in this section, the rest should be in section 1 > It is daemon. > [ [1m[32mOK(B[m ] config file /etc/pam.d/smtp has man page /usr/share/man/man8/smtp.8.gz > [ [1m[31mError(B[m ] man page is in unexpected section 8. Man pages for configuration files should be in section 5 > False positive it's manual page for SMTP+LMTP client. > [ [1m[31mError(B[m ] config file /etc/pam.d/smtp.postfix has no man page! Check it's content for proper documentation > No manual page exists. > [ [1m[33mWarn(B[m ] these (44) man pages left unassigned: > Probably OK. > checking /usr/share/man/man5/postconf.5.gz: > [ [1m[32mOK(B[m ] man page parsing with lexgrog succeeded > [ [1m[33mWarn(B[m ] found repeated words in man page: number number type:table > It seems like false positive. > checking /usr/share/man/man5/virtual.5.gz: > [ [1m[32mOK(B[m ] man page parsing with lexgrog succeeded > [ [1m[33mWarn(B[m ] found repeated words in man page: address, address, address, address, > False positive.