Dear, In order to provides to fedora community, DCD tools for enable autocomplete dlang statement with your favourite IDE. It is necessary to package its dependencies. SPEC: https://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/packages/libdparse.spec SRPMS: https://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/packages/libdparse-0.9.0-1.fc28.src.rpm
- URL should be https://github.com/dlang-community/libdparse/ - Use: Source0: https://github.com/dlang-community/libdparse/archive/v%{version}%{?pre:-%{pre}}/%{name}-%{version}%{?pre:-%{pre}}.tar.gz + ldc2 -I src -o- -c src/dparse/parser.d -Hf include//dparse/parser.di BUILDSTDERR: src/dparse/parser.d(9): Error: module `mallocator` is in file 'stdx/allocator/mallocator.d' which cannot be read BUILDSTDERR: import path[0] = src BUILDSTDERR: import path[1] = /usr/include/d/ldc BUILDSTDERR: import path[2] = /usr/include/d - You need to include -I %{_includedir}/d/stdx-allocator: # generate header ldc2 -I %{_includedir}/d/stdx-allocator -I "${src_dir}" -o- -c $f -Hf ${header_file}; # generate doc ldc2 -I %{_includedir}/d/stdx-allocator -I "${src_dir}" -o- -c $f -Df ${doc_file} doc-src/index.ddoc doc-src/macros.ddoc; # generate object ldc2 -I %{_includedir}/d/stdx-allocator -I "${src_dir}" ${DFLAGS} -c -relocation-model=pic $f -of ${object_file} - I think it would be nice to implement Meson for this too: ================================================================ # debug info seem not works with D compiler %global debug_package %{nil} %global major_version 0 %global minor_version 9 %global patch_version 1 #%%global pre beta Name: libdparse Version: %{major_version}.%{minor_version}.%{patch_version} Release: 1%{?pre:.%{pre}}%{?dist} Summary: Library for lexing and parsing D source code Summary(fr): Bibliothèque pour l'analyse syntaxique et grammaticale de code source D License: Boost URL: https://github.com/dlang-community/libdparse Source0: https://github.com/dlang-community/libdparse/archive/v%{version}%{?pre:-%{pre}}/%{name}-%{version}%{?pre:-%{pre}}.tar.gz Patch0: https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/dlang-community/libdparse/pull/257.patch#/0001-Add-Meson-build-definition.patch ExclusiveArch: %{ldc_arches} BuildRequires: ldc meson stdx-allocator-devel Requires: ldc-phobos ldc-druntime stdx-allocator %description Library for lexing and parsing D source code. %description -l fr Bibliothèque pour l'analyse syntaxique et grammaticale de code source en D. %package devel Summary: Development files for %{name} Summary(fr): Fichiers de développement pour %{name} Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} Requires: stdx-allocator-devel %description devel libdparse package contains header files for developing D applications that use libdparse. %description devel -l fr Le paquet libdparse contient les fichiers d'entêtes pour développer des applications en D utilisant libdparse. %package geany-tags Summary: Support for enable autocompletion in geany Summary(fr): Support pour activer l'auto-complétion dans geany Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: geany Requires: geany %description geany-tags Enable autocompletion for dsymbol library in geany (IDE) %description -l fr geany-tags Active l'autocompletion pour pour la bibliothèque dsymbol dans geany (IDE) %prep %autosetup -p1 -n %{name}-%{version}%{?pre:-%{pre}} # temp geany config directory for allow geany to generate tags mkdir geany_config %build LDFLAGS='-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now' %meson %meson_build # generate doc src_dir='src' sources=$(find "${src_dir}" -name '*.d') for f in ${sources[@]}; do d_path=$(dirname ${f}); d_file=$(basename ${f}); doc_file=doc-src/${d_path/${src_dir}}/${d_file/.d/.html} ldc2 -I %{_includedir}/d/stdx-allocator -I "${src_dir}" -o- -c $f -Df ${doc_file} doc-src/index.ddoc doc-src/macros.ddoc; done mv doc-src html # generate geany tags headers=$(find src -name '*.d') geany -c geany_config -g %{name}.d.tags ${headers[@]} %install %meson_install # geany tags mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/geany/tags/ install -pm0644 %{name}.d.tags %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/geany/tags/ %ldconfig_scriptlets %files %license LICENSE_1_0.txt %doc README.md %{_libdir}/libdparse.so.%{version} %{_libdir}/libdparse.so.%{major_version} %files devel %doc html %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/dparse.pc %{_includedir}/d/dparse %{_libdir}/libdparse.so %files geany-tags %{_datadir}/geany/tags/%{name}.d.tags %changelog * Thu Aug 2 2018 MERCIER Jonathan <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> - 0.9.0-1 - Initial release =========================================================
Thanks Robert-André SPEC: https://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/packages/libdparse.spec SRPMS: https://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/packages/libdparse-0.9.2-2.fc28.src.rpm
- You should update/redownload the patch as I updated it upstream. - You can add: %check %meson_test to run the test app. Package approved. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "*No copyright* BSL", "Unknown or generated". 99 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/libdparse/review-libdparse/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libdparse-geany-tags [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: libdparse-0.9.2-2.fc30.x86_64.rpm libdparse-devel-0.9.2-2.fc30.x86_64.rpm libdparse-geany-tags-0.9.2-2.fc30.noarch.rpm libdparse-0.9.2-2.fc30.src.rpm libdparse.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) lexing -> flexing, sexing, hexing libdparse.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found fr libdparse.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lexing -> flexing, sexing, hexing libdparse.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libdparse.so.0.9.2 libdparse-geany-tags.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) autocompletion -> auto completion, auto-completion, completion libdparse-geany-tags.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autocompletion -> auto completion, auto-completion, completion libdparse-geany-tags.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dsymbol -> symbol, d symbol libdparse-geany-tags.noarch: W: no-documentation libdparse.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) lexing -> flexing, sexing, hexing libdparse.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lexing -> flexing, sexing, hexing 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libdparse
libdparse-0.9.9-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c0b4de3712
libdparse-0.9.9-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c0b4de3712
libdparse-0.9.9-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.