Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 1614926

Summary:	[RFE] Improve RGW Multi-site radosgw-admin sync status and radosgw-admin bucket sync status commands
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	tserlin
Component:	RGW	Assignee:	Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Tejas <tchandra>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	2.5	CC:	anharris, assingh, cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, edonnell, hklein, hnallurv, kbader, mbenjamin, owasserm, sweil, tchandra, vikumar, vimishra, vumrao
Target Milestone:	z2	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	2.5
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	RHEL: ceph-10.2.10-36.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_10.2.10-31redhat1	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:	Increased detail has been added to the "radosgw-admin" sync status command, and a new "radosgw-admin bucket sync status" command has been added. The new commands provide more detailed reporting on the state of Ceph Object Gateway multi-site sync processes. Administrators can more easily confirm that multi-site sync is working correctly, and more easily debug sync issues.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1466956	Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-09-05 19:39:32 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1568569

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2018-09-05 19:39:32 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2651

Comment 12 Vikhyat Umrao 2018-09-07 19:57:04 UTC

Changed the title to avoid the confusion.