Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1615272 - hammer repository-set list ignores the --enabled flag
Summary: hammer repository-set list ignores the --enabled flag
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Repositories
Version: 6.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact: vijsingh
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-08-13 08:24 UTC by Peter Ondrejka
Modified: 2019-10-02 16:08 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-10-02 16:08:02 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Peter Ondrejka 2018-08-13 08:24:31 UTC 
Description of problem:

hammer repository-set list doesn't seem to react to the --enabled flag for "orphaned" repo (for the record, --with-active-subscription works ok). Orphaned repo is a repo that has been synced but it's subscription has been removed

 ~]# hammer repository-set list --product-id 43 --organization testorg --enabled yes 
-----|------|-------------------------------------------------
ID   | TYPE | NAME                                            
-----|------|-------------------------------------------------
5286 | yum  | Red Hat Satellite 6.3 (for RHEL 7 Server) (RPMs)
-----|------|-------------------------------------------------

~]# hammer repository-set list --product-id 43 --organization testorg --enabled no
-----|------|-------------------------------------------------
ID   | TYPE | NAME                                            
-----|------|-------------------------------------------------
5286 | yum  | Red Hat Satellite 6.3 (for RHEL 7 Server) (RPMs)
-----|------|-------------------------------------------------

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
always 

Steps to Reproduce:
1 import manifest w/ satellite subscription
2 enable and sync e.g. satellite rpms repo
3 refresh manifest from portal where satellite subscription had been removed
4 run the above commands

Actual results:
repository is displayed both as enabled and disabled

Expected results:
repository is filtered correctly by hammer

Additional info:
found when verifying 1590404
Comment 2 Brad Buckingham 2018-08-14 17:27:51 UTC 
Hi Peter, is this a regression from 6.3?
Comment 3 Peter Ondrejka 2018-08-16 11:01:18 UTC 
Barnaby, in 6.3 hammer repository-set list didn't have the --enable option available yet, neither  --with-active-subscription. So not a regression because these options are new.
Comment 4 Peter Ondrejka 2018-08-16 11:09:47 UTC 
I mean *Brad* of course, sorry, too many bz tabs open :)
Comment 5 Bryan Kearney 2019-09-03 19:06:54 UTC 
The Satellite Team is attempting to provide an accurate backlog of bugzilla requests which we feel will be resolved in the next few releases. We do not believe this bugzilla will meet that criteria, and have plans to close it out in 1 month. This is not a reflection on the validity of the request, but a reflection of the many priorities for the product. If you have any concerns about this, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support or your account team. If we do not hear from you, we will close this bug out. Thank you.
Comment 6 Bryan Kearney 2019-10-02 16:08:02 UTC 
Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please do not reopen. Instead, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support. Thank you.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.