Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1621111

Summary: [RFE][DOCS] Improve documentation on Container storage driver
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Renato Puccini <rpuccini>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Michael Burke <mburke>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Johnny Liu <jialiu>
Severity: low Docs Contact: Vikram Goyal <vigoyal>
Priority: low    
Version: 3.9.0CC: aos-bugs, jialiu, jokerman, mburke, mifiedle, mmccomas, rpuccini, vigoyal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-09-11 15:59:45 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
puccini-walsh-howe-overlay-email none

Description Renato Puccini 2018-08-23 13:40:21 UTC
Document URL: 
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.9/scaling_performance/optimizing_storage.html#comparing-overlay-graph-drivers

Section Number and Name: 
Choosing a Graph Driver

Describe the issue: 
We would like to request documentation improvements regarding:

according to the docs[1], the recommendation is to use device-mapper thin pool?

"Red Hat strongly recommends using the DeviceMapper storage driver in thin-pool mode for production workloads."

Should the docs be upgraded/reworded, so the recommendation is overlayFS2 (since it has better design and performance)?


[1] https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.9/scaling_performance/optimizing_storage.html#comparing-overlay-graph-drivers

Comment 3 Michael Burke 2018-08-27 17:40:54 UTC
Created attachment 1479020 [details]
puccini-walsh-howe-overlay-email

Comment 13 Johnny Liu 2018-09-07 08:06:22 UTC
LGTM.