Bug 1621359 (CVE-2018-16511) - CVE-2018-16511 ghostscript: missing type check in type checker (699659)
Summary: CVE-2018-16511 ghostscript: missing type check in type checker (699659)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: CVE-2018-16511
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1621383 1621385 1628536 1628537
Blocks: 1619570
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-08-23 15:23 UTC by Stefan Cornelius
Modified: 2022-03-13 15:26 UTC (History)
17 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ghostscript 9.24
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
It was discovered that the ghostscript .type operator did not properly validate its operands. A specially crafted PostScript document could exploit this to crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the context of the ghostscript process.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-11-28 15:42:00 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2018:3650 0 None None None 2018-11-27 01:21:19 UTC

Description Stefan Cornelius 2018-08-23 15:23:30 UTC
It was discovered that the ghostscript type checker did not properly validate certain types. A specially crafted PostScript document could exploit this to crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the context of the ghostscript process.

Patch:
http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commit;h=0edd3d6c

Comment 1 Stefan Cornelius 2018-08-23 15:23:33 UTC
Mitigation:

Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619748#c3

Comment 5 Sam Fowler 2018-09-06 02:55:58 UTC
Upstream Patch:

http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commit;h=0edd3d6c

Comment 7 Tomas Hoger 2018-09-13 11:39:21 UTC
Upstream bug report (still not public):

https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699659

Correct upstream fix is noted in comment 5 rather than comment 0.

Comment 8 Tomas Hoger 2018-09-13 11:41:47 UTC
This has been public for a while, via both upstream commit and the following upstream annoncement:

https://www.artifex.com/news/ghostscript-security-resolved/

Comment 9 Tomas Hoger 2018-09-13 11:42:50 UTC
Created ghostscript tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1628536]

Comment 13 Cedric Buissart 2018-11-20 10:04:25 UTC
Statement:

This issue affects the versions of ghostscript as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, 6, and 7.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 is now in Maintenance Support 2 Phase of the support and maintenance life cycle. This has been rated as having a security impact of Important, and is not currently planned to be addressed in future updates. For additional information, refer to the Red Hat Enterprise Linux Life Cycle: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 is now in Extended Life Phase of the support and maintenance life cycle. This issue is not currently planned to be addressed in future updates. For additional information, refer to the Red Hat Enterprise Linux Life Cycle: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/.

Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2018-11-27 01:21:13 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7

Via RHSA-2018:3650 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3650


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.