Bug 162257 - irq stacks not being used for hardirqs
Summary: irq stacks not being used for hardirqs
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 4.0
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Jason Baron
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 156322
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-07-01 18:48 UTC by Jason Baron
Modified: 2013-03-06 05:58 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHSA-2005-514
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-10-05 13:38:56 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2005:514 0 qe-ready SHIPPED_LIVE Important: Updated kernel packages available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Update 2 2005-10-05 04:00:00 UTC

Description Jason Baron 2005-07-01 18:48:25 UTC
Description of problem:

Currently, x86 boxes make use of a process's stack for hardirq handling. With 4K
stacks, we should really be using irq stacks which are per cpu


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

We don't have any specific bugs for this issue. But this is a fundamental
assumption that kernel code relies upon, and is the default setup for 4K stacks
upstream.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Jason Baron 2005-07-06 16:06:20 UTC
*** Bug 162548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 craig harmer 2005-07-07 07:56:37 UTC
unfortunately, veritas' vxfs tends to use more stack space than other file
systems on linux.  although we don't have any actual overflow cases in our
limited testing with 4 Kbyte stacks, we think they may well occur at customer
sites.  so this bug is high priority for us.

since the bug report i opened was closed as a dup of this one, so i'd like to
change the priority of this bug to "high".

Comment 12 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-10-05 13:38:57 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-514.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.