Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1622617

Summary: /dev/tpmrm0 file has wrong SELinux file context
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Blair Aitken <baitken>
Component: selinux-policyAssignee: Lukas Vrabec <lvrabec>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Milos Malik <mmalik>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.5CC: lvrabec, mgrepl, mmalik, plautrba, ralston, ssekidde, vmojzis
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-10-30 10:09:38 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Blair Aitken 2018-08-27 15:36:08 UTC
policy/modules/kernel/devices.fc in serefpolicy-3.13.1 contains this rule:

/dev/tpm[0-9]*		-c	gen_context(system_u:object_r:tpm_device_t,s0)

But on some of our systems, we also have a /dev/tpmrm0 device file.

Because there are no file contexts that specifically target /dev/tmprm[0-9]* device files, this device file inherits the default device_t label.

While this is a very minor SELinux labeling issue, we run RHEL7 on hosts where we must comply with various third-party security guidelines, such as the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) RHEL7 Secure Technical Implementation Guide (STIG). We must proactively report on areas where we fail conformance, and propose a plan of action to achieve conformance. Furthermore, we are regularly inspected and audited on our conformance to these guidelines.

The RHEL7 STIG requires that all device files in /dev have specific SELinux file types other than the device_t type:

http://rhel7stig.readthedocs.io/en/latest/medium.html#v-72039-all-system-device-files-must-be-correctly-labeled-to-prevent-unauthorized-modification-rhel-07-020900

Because the /dev/tpmrm0 file has the device_t file type, instead of a more specific file type, we fail conformance to the RHEL-07-020900 STIG rule on hosts with this device file.

We've worked around this issue in our custom SELinux policy:

# We need this until Red Hat adds this upstream.
/dev/tpmrm[0-9]*	-c	gen_context(system_u:object_r:tpm_device_t,s0)

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2018-10-30 10:09:38 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3111