Description of problem: I am observing these error messages in journalctl: ... Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 94, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 91, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 87, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 83, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 79, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 75, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 71, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 67, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 66, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 65, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 61, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 57, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 53, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 49, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 45, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 41, starting at character 50 (',') Aug 28 06:29:56 rockford systemd-udevd[634]: invalid key/value pair in file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules on line 37, starting at character 50 (',') Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): flashrom-1.0-3.fc28.x86_64 How reproducible: Always, on different machines. Additional info: I don't know much about udev-rules, but my gut feeling is, all these lines being complained about, might be typos in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/z60_flashrom.rules, which possibly should be using "TAG+=" instead of "TAG=+".
Apparently, there is a typo inside of the spec: diff --git a/flashrom.spec b/flashrom.spec index 1583b81..d3c57b8 100644 --- a/flashrom.spec +++ b/flashrom.spec @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ other programmer devices. %setup -q %patch0 -p1 # Replace GROUP="plugdev" specifiers with TAG+="uaccess" -sed -e 's/MODE="[0-9]*", GROUP="plugdev"/TAG=+"uaccess"/g' util/z60_flashrom.rules -i +sed -e 's/MODE="[0-9]*", GROUP="plugdev"/TAG+="uaccess"/g' util/z60_flashrom.rules -i %ifarch %{ix86} x86_64 # 'internal' programmer is only supported on x86 platforms
flashrom-1.0-6.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-30213f3c2a
flashrom-1.0-6.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-28983c31e6
flashrom-1.0-6.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-28983c31e6
flashrom-1.0-6.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-30213f3c2a
flashrom-1.0-6.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
flashrom-1.0-6.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
flashrom-1.0.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-85606b4931
flashrom-1.0.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-85606b4931
flashrom-1.0.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.