Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1623502

Summary: missing efs-provisioner container
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Bradley Childs <bchilds>
Component: StorageAssignee: Fabio Bertinatto <fbertina>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Chao Yang <chaoyang>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 3.9.0CC: aos-bugs, aos-storage-staff, fbertina, jhou
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 3.9.z   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1623500 Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-09-22 04:53:09 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1623500    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Bradley Childs 2018-08-29 13:54:48 UTC
The efs provisioner container is in 3.6, but missing in 3.9.  it needs to be added to the 3.7 per process so that it remains in the dot builds.

Comment 6 Chao Yang 2018-09-17 08:22:08 UTC
Passed for 
docker pull registry.reg-aws.openshift.com:443/openshift3/ose-efs-provisioner:v3.9.43
Trying to pull repository registry.reg-aws.openshift.com:443/openshift3/ose-efs-provisioner ... 
v3.9.43: Pulling from registry.reg-aws.openshift.com:443/openshift3/ose-efs-provisioner
367d84554057: Already exists 
b82a357e4f15: Already exists 
f4c081dea5e2: Pull complete 
Digest: sha256:c72be56701fc96e26136dd177be4b2b95c9e676c8b014870bac2ef000a6f5a00
Status: Downloaded newer image for registry.reg-aws.openshift.com:443/openshift3/ose-efs-provisioner:v3.9.43

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2018-09-22 04:53:09 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2658