Hide Forgot
In line with the Mass Python 2 Package Removal [0], the following (sub)packages of python-inotify_simple were marked for removal: * python2-inotify_simple According to our query, those packages only provide a Python 2 importable module. If this is not true, please tell us why, so we can fix our query. Please remove them from your package. As said in the change document, if there is no objection in a week, we will remove the package(s) as soon as we get to it. This change might not match your packaging style, so we'd prefer if you did the change. If you need more time, please let us know here. We hope this doesn't come to you as a surprise. If you want to know our motivation for this, please read the change document [0]. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #0) > According to our query, those packages only provide a Python 2 importable > module. I don't know what do you mean by "importable" module. It's ported for both python2 and python3 (and it should work just fine). > Please remove them from your package. Maintenance of that subpackage costs me nothing, and I basically dislike the forced Python 2 removal (if I don't mind maintaining that). > As said in the change document, if there is no objection in a week, we will > remove the package(s) as soon as we get to it. Feel free to drop that. It should be one-liner (%bcond change). Per [0] document: > so far no one else has stepped up to maintain Python 2 Once/if anyone commits himself to maintain compat Python 2, I'll re-enable. > [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal
By importable module I mean the package provides only a Python library. Do you want a if Fedora >= 30 in there or not?
I don't mind, it's your decision what happens with Fedora then. But please keep the spec file buildable on epel7.
Sorry, I've read 'unportable' instead of importable.