Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 163037 - CAN-2005-1849 zlib buffer overflow
CAN-2005-1849 zlib buffer overflow
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: zlib (Show other bugs)
4.0
All Linux
medium Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Ivana Varekova
Jay Turner
embargo=?,impact=important,source=ven...
: Security
Depends On:
Blocks: CVE-2005-1849
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-07-12 09:46 EDT by Josh Bressers
Modified: 2015-01-07 19:10 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHSA-2005-584
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 918047 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-07-21 13:50:18 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2005:584 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: zlib security update 2005-07-21 00:00:00 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Josh Bressers 2005-07-12 09:46:48 EDT
A buffer overflow issue has been found in zlib that can overflow
inflate_state.codes[ENOUGH] by 16 bytes.

It is possible to leverage this issue by creating a valid zlib stream.
Comment 1 Josh Bressers 2005-07-12 09:48:03 EDT
This issue does not affect RHEL2.1 or RHEL3
Comment 2 Mark J. Cox 2005-07-21 13:35:44 EDT
This has been made public at least in a Debian update yesterday, so removing
embargo from the bug.
Comment 3 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-07-21 13:50:19 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-584.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.