Bug 1632313
| Summary: | Ignore spurious nested stack locks in convergence | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Zane Bitter <zbitter> |
| Component: | openstack-heat | Assignee: | Zane Bitter <zbitter> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Ronnie Rasouli <rrasouli> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 13.0 (Queens) | CC: | bshephar, cylopez, jschluet, mburns, pamadio, rrasouli, sbaker, shardy, srevivo, therve, zbitter |
| Target Milestone: | z3 | Keywords: | Triaged, ZStream |
| Target Release: | 13.0 (Queens) | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | openstack-heat-10.0.2-2.el7ost | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Cause: When convergence is enabled for a stack, the "stack check" operation uses a different type of locking (stack-level instead of resource-level) from regular operations such as "stack update" or "stack delete". However, when processing nested stacks they are not considered complete until any stack-level lock is released.
Consequence: Any stale locks left behind in a nested stack by a stack check will cause the parent stack to time out when updating or deleting the nested stack.
Fix: Ignore the stack-level locks when checking the completion of any nested stack operation (like update or delete in convergence stacks) that uses only resource-level locks.
Result: Any stray locks left behind in the database will not prevent further operations on the nested stack.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 1632295 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2018-11-13 22:14:23 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1626367, 1632295 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Zane Bitter
2018-09-24 15:31:45 UTC
Merged upstream in stable/queens. This could affect osp 10 too ? (In reply to Cyril Lopez from comment #3) > This could affect osp 10 too ? Yes, in the overcloud. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3603 |