Bug 1633471
| Summary: | Incorrect steps while taking consideration for glusterfs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Jaspreet Kaur <jkaur> | |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Kathryn Alexander <kalexand> | |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | krishnaram Karthick <kramdoss> | |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Vikram Goyal <vigoyal> | |
| Priority: | high | |||
| Version: | 3.11.0 | CC: | amark, aos-bugs, dmoessne, jokerman, kalexand, mmccomas, pprakash, weshi, wsun | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened | |
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1805399 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-10-31 18:11:26 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1805399 | |||
|
Description
Jaspreet Kaur
2018-09-27 06:24:29 UTC
The issue is there in 3.10 also. Please check the improvement in this bug : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631162#c4 PR's here: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/12349 @Xiaoli Tian, will you PTAL? Kathryn, I just commented on the pull request, I think we still want to set the type=upgrade labels to ensure we can run the playbook just against a certain node. Also see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631162#c5 , discussing this Daniel, I don't see your comment on the PR. The change includes "$ oc label node <node_name> type=upgrade" which is what you want, right? (In reply to Kathryn Alexander from comment #6) > Daniel, I don't see your comment on the PR. > > The change includes "$ oc label node <node_name> type=upgrade" which is what > you want, right? yes, oc label node <node_name> type=upgrade" should still be there, thanks Kathryn Looks good to me~ Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/commit/2577ad653e08244e64ea14a94b2ac2d38aff3f51 bug 1633471 updating gluster upgrade https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/commit/c662de7689895e4b4810c72a3893097d392a1529 Merge pull request #12349 from kalexand-rh/BZ1633471 bug 1633471 updating gluster upgrade This change is live on docs.openshift: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.11/upgrading/automated_upgrades.html#special-considerations-for-glusterfs And on the portal: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/3.11/html-single/upgrading_clusters/index#special-considerations-for-glusterfs The update's here: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/12587/ @Wenkai, I think the change is ok, but will you please double-check before I merge? (In reply to Kathryn Alexander from comment #15) > The update's here: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/12587/ > > @Wenkai, I think the change is ok, but will you please double-check before I > merge? Looks good to me Thank you! I'm merging the change and waiting for it to go live. This change is live on docs.openshift, eg: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.11/upgrading/automated_upgrades.html#special-considerations-for-glusterfs And on the portal, eg: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/3.10/html-single/upgrading_clusters/#special-considerations-for-glusterfs |