Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 1633508

Summary: default `osd_objectstore` to bluestore
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Sébastien Han <shan>
Component: Ceph-AnsibleAssignee: Sébastien Han <shan>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Parikshith <pbyregow>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 3.2CC: anharris, aschoen, ceph-eng-bugs, gmeno, hnallurv, kdreyer, nthomas, sankarshan, vumrao
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 3.2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-ansible-3.2.0-0.1.beta5.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph-ansible_3.2.0~beta5-2redhat1 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-01-03 19:01:53 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Sébastien Han 2018-09-27 08:00:18 UTC
Description of problem:

All tooling in Ceph is defaulting to use the bluestore objectstore for provisioning OSDs, there is no good reason for ceph-ansible to continue to default to filestore.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

OSDs get configured with filestore by default.

Expected results:

OSDs should be configured with bluestore by default.

Additional info:

Comment 3 Sébastien Han 2018-09-28 15:11:11 UTC
Merged upstream and will be in v3.2.0beta3

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2019-01-03 19:01:53 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0020