Hide Forgot
Open vSwitch v2.10 was released in August and there's no such package in Fedora. This is a key component for different projects such as OpenStack.
Hi Timothy, Let's update Rawhide and Beta with 2.10 as we discussed. fbl
openvswitch-2.10.0-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-06116a0f7f
openvswitch-2.10.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-06116a0f7f
This package (any version) is not available for i386 in F29. In particular, this makes the MATE desktop uninstallable on i386: [root@dell-pc ~]# dnf groupinstall mate-desktop-environment Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:58 ago on Fri 02 Nov 2018 05:46:05 AM EDT. No match for group package "xorg-x11-drv-omap" No match for group package "xorg-x11-drv-armsoc" No match for group package "powerpc-utils" No match for group package "lsvpd" Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides openvswitch needed by NetworkManager-ovs-1:1.12.4-1.fc29.i686 [root@dell-pc ~]# It was not included in the Koji build for openvswitch-2.9.2-6.fc29 or for openvswitch-2.10.0-1.fc29. Is this intentional?
openvswitch-2.10.0-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f2bdd9b7c6
openvswitch-2.10.0-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f2bdd9b7c6
openvswitch-2.10.0-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
There is some dependency problem in F29 after this was pushed to stable, I'm not sure what's going on. If people with updates-testing enabled don't see this, there must be another u-t package that needs to go to stable. [root@lenovo-pc ~]# dnf update Fedora 29 - x86_64 - VirtualBox 5.9 kB/s | 6.9 kB 00:01 Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'virtualbox', ignoring this repo. Last metadata expiration check: 0:50:25 ago on Sun 11 Nov 2018 12:11:17 PM EST. Dependencies resolved. Problem: cannot install both unbound-libs-1.7.3-9.fc29.x86_64 and unbound-libs-1.8.1-1.fc29.x86_64 - package openvswitch-2.10.0-2.fc29.x86_64 requires libunbound.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package unbound-libs-1.8.1-1.fc29.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package openvswitch-2.9.2-6.fc29.x86_64 ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): unbound-libs x86_64 1.7.3-9.fc29 fedora 452 k Skipping packages with broken dependencies: openvswitch x86_64 2.10.0-2.fc29 updates 1.8 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Skip 2 Packages Nothing to do. Complete! [root@lenovo-pc ~]# dnf --best --allowerasing update Fedora 29 - x86_64 - VirtualBox 6.1 kB/s | 6.9 kB 00:01 Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'virtualbox', ignoring this repo. Last metadata expiration check: 0:50:33 ago on Sun 11 Nov 2018 12:11:17 PM EST. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Removing: openvswitch x86_64 2.9.2-6.fc29 @fedora 5.5 M Removing dependent packages: NetworkManager-ovs x86_64 1:1.12.4-2.fc29 @updates 60 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Remove 2 Packages Freed space: 5.5 M Is this ok [y/N]: N Operation aborted. [root@lenovo-pc ~]#
The problem was that, in the meanwhile, unbound-libs was updated to 1.8.0 (with soname 8), but openvswitch was built with the old unbound-libs (with soname 2). The strange thing is that the previous version of OVS (openvswitch-2.10.0-1.fc29) was build with the new unbound-libs (with soname 8) instead. I launched a new build of OVS and I checked that it's using the correct unbound-libs version.