Bug 1634682
| Summary: | lvcache cockpit section should input the target LV to be cached, in case of thick LV is chosen for brick | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [oVirt] cockpit-ovirt | Reporter: | SATHEESARAN <sasundar> |
| Component: | Gdeploy | Assignee: | Parth Dhanjal <dparth> |
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | SATHEESARAN <sasundar> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 0.11.29 | CC: | bugs, dparth, godas, guillaume.pavese, sabose |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | sasundar:
ovirt-4.3?
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-03-27 08:04:17 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | Gluster | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1608268 | ||
|
Description
SATHEESARAN
2018-10-01 11:10:20 UTC
This bug has not been marked as blocker for oVirt 4.3.0. Since we are releasing it tomorrow, January 29th, this bug has been re-targeted to 4.3.1. This was pushed to ovirt-4.3.3 but was it not meant to be 4.3.2? Asking because I am particularly waiting for this feature to deploy production (In reply to Guillaume Pavese from comment #2) > This was pushed to ovirt-4.3.3 but was it not meant to be 4.3.2? > Asking because I am particularly waiting for this feature to deploy > production Can you please elaborate on your requirement? Maybe we can figure a work-around it. Hi, we have abandoned Gluster/Hyperconverged and will setup HE on iSCSI We were awaiting LV Cache for thick provisioning as we were expecting to use VDO (forced on Thick P currently) on RAID5 HDD + SSD Cache But it was not clear anyway that LV Cache was performing as promised ; as asked by a RedHat engineer (Leif Madsen , who did not get an answer to his question) on BZ 1608268. So we were not confident enough in the end. (In reply to Guillaume Pavese from comment #4) > Hi, we have abandoned Gluster/Hyperconverged and will setup HE on iSCSI > > We were awaiting LV Cache for thick provisioning as we were expecting to use > VDO (forced on Thick P currently) on RAID5 HDD + SSD Cache > But it was not clear anyway that LV Cache was performing as promised ; as > asked by a RedHat engineer (Leif Madsen , who did not get an answer to his > question) on BZ 1608268. So we were not confident enough in the end. Hi, You can use the updated VDO systemd unit file as per the article[1], that fixes this problem. This will enable discards to work with VDO & thinpool [1] - https://access.redhat.com/solutions/3562021 This fix is not really required, as the thinpool can now be supported on top of VDO |