Bug 1634882 - hamlib: Remove (sub)packages from Fedora 30+: python2-hamlib
Summary: hamlib: Remove (sub)packages from Fedora 30+: python2-hamlib
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: hamlib
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Lucian Langa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: PY2REMOVAL
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-10-01 19:08 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2018-10-04 15:04 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-10-04 14:25:26 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miro Hrončok 2018-10-01 19:08:57 UTC
In line with the Mass Python 2 Package Removal [0], the following (sub)packages of hamlib were marked for removal:

 * python2-hamlib

According to our query, those (sub)packages only provide a Python 2 importable module. If this is not true, please tell us why, so we can fix our query.

Please remove them from your package.

As said in the change document, if there is no objection in a week, we will remove the package(s) as soon as we get to it. This change might not match your packaging style, so we'd prefer if you did the change. If you need more time, please let us know here.

We hope this doesn't come to you as a surprise. If you want to know our motivation for this, please read the change document [0].

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal

Comment 1 Richard Shaw 2018-10-04 14:25:26 UTC
Changed to python3 for f30+...

Comment 2 Igor Raits 2018-10-04 14:52:49 UTC
65 + %{python3_sitearch}/__pycache__/

FYI, this is wrong and you should not do this.

Comment 3 Richard Shaw 2018-10-04 14:56:14 UTC
Wasn't sure what to do with it for now. %exclude?

Comment 4 Igor Raits 2018-10-04 14:57:16 UTC
%{python3_sitearch}/__pycache__/hamlib.*

Comment 5 Richard Shaw 2018-10-04 14:58:43 UTC
Worth rebuilding?

Comment 6 Igor Raits 2018-10-04 14:59:32 UTC
Unless it takes few days to rebuild, I would say so.

Comment 7 Miro Hrončok 2018-10-04 15:01:00 UTC
It's wrong but it causes no real runtime trouble, so it probably can wait for next rebuild. On the other hand the rebuild won't hurt anybody.

Comment 8 Richard Shaw 2018-10-04 15:04:55 UTC
Kicked off...

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30047463


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.