Bug 163609 - Handle the new Solaris partition ID
Summary: Handle the new Solaris partition ID
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: util-linux
Version: 4.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Karel Zak
QA Contact: Ben Levenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 156322
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-07-19 14:27 UTC by Karel Zak
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2005-669
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-10-05 16:54:13 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2005:669 0 qe-ready SHIPPED_LIVE util-linux bug fix update 2005-10-05 04:00:00 UTC

Description Karel Zak 2005-07-19 14:27:15 UTC
FC3, FC4 and upstream use:

--- util-linux-2.12a/fdisk/i386_sys_types.c.sopwith     2004-11-12
11:12:36.118449940 -0500
+++ util-linux-2.12a/fdisk/i386_sys_types.c     2004-11-12 11:15:28.764795949 -0500
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
        {0xb8, N_("BSDI swap")},
        {0xbb, N_("Boot Wizard hidden")},
        {0xbe, N_("Solaris boot")},
+       {0xbf, N_("Solaris VTOC")},
        {0xc1, N_("DRDOS/sec (FAT-12)")},
        {0xc4, N_("DRDOS/sec (FAT-16 < 32M)")},
        {0xc6, N_("DRDOS/sec (FAT-16)")},


It was rejected directly before RHEL4 GA. I think we can use it now. The patch
is already in CVS by Ellliot.

Comment 6 Karel Zak 2005-09-04 22:21:37 UTC
util-linux/RHEL-4/util-linux-2.12a/fdisk$ grep 0xbf *
i386_sys_types.c:       {0xbf, N_("Solaris")},

I used same label like upstream in last versions (see FC4). It means "Solaris"
rather than "Solaris VTOC".

Comment 9 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-10-05 16:54:14 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-669.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.