Description of problem: commit eb472d82a083883335bc494b87ea175ac43471ff in master introduced a bug where a data-self-heal on a file in arbiter leaves a stale inodelk behind on the bricks. Thus any new write to the file from a client can hang How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create 1x (2+1) arbiter, fuse mount it and create a file 2. Kill arbiter brick, write to the file, bring back arbiter and let self-heal complete. 3. Next write to the file from mount will hang because the inodelk gets blocked because of the previous stale locks left behind from self-heal Additional info: Downstream bug which found the issue: BZ 1636902
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/21380 (afr: prevent winding inodelks twice for arbiter volumes) posted (#1) for review on master by Ravishankar N
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/21380 committed in master by "Amar Tumballi" <amarts> with a commit message- afr: prevent winding inodelks twice for arbiter volumes Problem: In an arbiter volume, if there is a pending data heal of a file only on arbiter brick, self-heal takes inodelks twice due to a code-bug but unlocks it only once, leaving behind a stale lock on the brick. This causes the next write to the file to hang. Fix: Fix the code-bug to take lock only once. This bug was introduced master with commit eb472d82a083883335bc494b87ea175ac43471ff Thanks to Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu> for finding the RCA. fixes: bz#1637802 Change-Id: I15ad969e10a6a3c4bd255e2948b6be6dcddc61e1 Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar>
*** Bug 1664223 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-6.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-6.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2019-March/000120.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/