Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Opening http://unitingchurch.org.au/media/guide.pdf results in evince consuming 100% of CPU (2.0GHz Centrino running at 800MHz) for about 45 seconds after opening the file. Also, scolling to various parts of the document (bottom, middle, top) quickly often results in the CPU consuming 100% of cycles and can take some time for text to appear on the page making the experience less than enjoyable. Initially evince seems to rending content quickly at low quality, and then re-renders content at a much superior quality. However, after a few scrolls up and down, this initial low quality rending seems to cease to function and getting anything rendered on the page can take some time (5 seconds to 1 minute approx). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): evince-0.3.1-2 poppler-0.3.3-1 How reproducible: Very reproducable and not just limited to the document listed above. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open PDF (or other???) file in evince, either from a website or from the local file system 2. Scroll up and down to various parts of the document. Actual results: Evince consumes the CPU cycles and eventually starts taking time to render content on the page. Expected results: Evince renders the visible part of the document quickly.
Here I open a document (a three page bill from my ISP) in both evince and xpdf, wait for the first page to render and then close the viewer. Evince took 22 seconds. Xpdf took 3 seconds. What's the problem with evince. ---------------------------------------------- $ time evince tmp/BillImage.pdf (evince:2904): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_tree_model_foreach: assertion `GTK_IS_TREE_MODEL (model)' failed (evince:2904): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_list_store_clear: assertion `GTK_IS_LIST_STORE (list_store)' failed real 0m22.592s user 0m21.241s sys 0m0.448s ---------------------------------------------- $ time xpdf tmp/BillImage.pdf real 0m2.587s user 0m0.396s sys 0m0.048s ---------------------------------------------- $ cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) $ rpm -qf /usr/bin/evince evince-0.5.1-3
Things are getting better: ---------------------------------------------- [~]$ time xpdf Congressional_Districts_-_109th_Congress.pdf XtUngrabButton(drawArea,3,0) Warning: Attempt to remove nonexistent passive grab real 0m6.810s user 0m5.692s sys 0m0.184s [~]$ time evince Congressional_Districts_-_109th_Congress.pdf real 0m10.123s user 0m8.577s sys 0m0.236s [~]$ ---------------------------------------------- [~]$ cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) [~]$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/evince evince-0.6.0-5.fc6 [~]$
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.
Right, while this seems improved, I've found a PDF that doesn't load very fast, so I'm reopening this bug. I'll attach the PDF for examination
Created attachment 301402 [details] This three page PDF takes considerable time to display
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.