Bug 164072 - hsqldb 1.8.0 for rawhide ?
Summary: hsqldb 1.8.0 for rawhide ?
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: hsqldb   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Gary Benson
QA Contact:
URL: http://hsqldb.org/
Keywords: FutureFeature
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2005-07-23 23:47 UTC by Caolan McNamara
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-08-04 10:59:15 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Caolan McNamara 2005-07-23 23:47:02 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050720 Fedora/1.7.10-3

Description of problem:
hsqldb 1.8.0 is now released, this is the version that OOo currently has in it's tree.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Upstream openoffice.org now uses an unpatched hsqldb 1.8.0, ideally I'd prefer to drop building the OOo intree copy and figure out how to make it use a system hsqldb 1.8.0.  Allowing me to put the blame for any hsqldb problems where they belong :-)

Additional info:

a) gcc19870 apparently affects in intree hsqldb 1.8.0, so I've been working around with a crude sed -s "private /public /g"
b) in hsqldb/src/org/hsqldb/HsqlDateTime.java...
       public boolean isZeroBit(int bit) {
            return (state & (1L << bit)) == 0;
gives a verification error on compilation to .so. Patching to simply give...
       public boolean isZeroBit(int bit) {
            boolean bRet = ((state & (1L << bit)) == 0);
            return bRet;
works around

Comment 1 Gary Benson 2005-08-04 10:59:15 UTC
Built in rawhide.

By the way, you should try using the system javac to build things.  It's ecj,
which is a _much_ better bytecode compiler than gcj.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.