Bug 1642005 - Ansible Networking – Overcloud deployment fails if “manage_vlans” parameter is used
Summary: Ansible Networking – Overcloud deployment fails if “manage_vlans” parameter i...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: puppet-neutron
Version: 14.0 (Rocky)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: beta
: 14.0 (Rocky)
Assignee: Dan Radez
QA Contact: Arkady Shtempler
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-10-23 11:15 UTC by Arkady Shtempler
Modified: 2019-01-11 11:54 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: puppet-neutron-13.3.1-0.20181013115834.el7ost
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-01-11 11:54:09 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
OpenStack gerrit 611297 0 None None None 2018-10-23 15:01:20 UTC
OpenStack gerrit 615553 0 None None None 2018-11-08 20:00:58 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2019:0045 0 None None None 2019-01-11 11:54:19 UTC

Description Arkady Shtempler 2018-10-23 11:15:29 UTC
Ansible Networking feature is using “ansible” user to configure switch remotely via SSH.
This “ansible” user is not permitted to create or delete VLANs on the switch and that’s fine, but sometimes we are trying to use this user for such purposes.
There is a parameter called “manage_vlans” which is managed to be set to True/False we could add to “neutron-ml2-ansible.yaml” template prevent this “ansible” user to manage VLANs.
The problem is that adding  will cause the deployment to fail and we have to fix that.

Comment 1 Bob Fournier 2018-10-23 14:48:56 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1641963 ***

Comment 2 Dan Radez 2018-10-23 15:00:34 UTC
This should be addressed by upstream:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611297/ once it makes its way through the process.

Comment 3 Bob Fournier 2018-11-08 19:57:59 UTC
Still need upstream backport to stable/rocky for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611297/

Comment 4 Bob Fournier 2018-11-08 20:00:58 UTC
> Still need upstream backport to stable/rocky

Never mind its done, updated trackers.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2019-01-11 11:54:09 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:0045


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.