Bug 1649062
| Summary: | [3.11] Binary builds are not automatically including the pull secret from the service account during the build. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Ben Parees <bparees> |
| Component: | Build | Assignee: | Ben Parees <bparees> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | wewang <wewang> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 3.11.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, florin.peter, jkaur, wewang, wzheng |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 3.11.z | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: |
Feature: Builds that do not explicitly indicate the docker image they consume (by providing an inline dockerfile or defining the docker strategy's From field) and do not explicitly indicate a pull secret to use, will now use the build's service account's docker secret by default. Examples of such builds would be a build that includes a Dockerfile in a git repo.
Reason: Previously these builds would use no secret and potentially fail if the base image was not public.
Result: Those builds will now succeed without the need to either explicitly specify a pull secret, or explicitly specify the base image in the buildconfig.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 1648775 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2018-12-12 14:15:49 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1648775, 1649063 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Ben Parees
2018-11-12 20:05:12 UTC
FYI, the bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648775 with 3.10 version already verified. Tested in newer version of openshift:v3.11.50, it verified Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3743 |