Bug 1649781 - Worker memory settings in the WebUI are incorrect and do not match the actual configured memory settings
Summary: Worker memory settings in the WebUI are incorrect and do not match the actual...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: UI - OPS
Version: 5.9.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.9.7
Assignee: Dan Clarizio
QA Contact: Jaroslav Henner
Red Hat CloudForms Documentation
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-11-14 14:05 UTC by Peter McGowan
Modified: 2018-11-14 19:15 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-11-14 19:15:40 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: CFME Core
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Peter McGowan 2018-11-14 14:05:48 UTC
Description of problem:
The Workers tab in the Configuration page for a CFME server shows the memory settings defined for each worker type. The setting is selectable from a drop-down, but the value displayed in this drop-down does not match the actual memory setting configured for that worker type, as confirmed by the "Advanced' configuration yaml. For example the default for several workers shows as 200MB whereas the actual threshold for these worker types is much higher.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.9.5.3

How reproducible:
Every time


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Navigate to Configuration -> Server -> Workers
2. Note the values displayed for the Memory thresholds for each worker type.
3. Compare to the actual memory threshold configured in the Advanced configuration yawl

Actual results:
The settings are different

Expected results:
The settings should be the same.

Additional info:

Comment 5 Harpreet Kataria 2018-11-14 19:15:40 UTC
Working as designed and as per changes made in https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/4633

Found one inconsistency found with display of Refresh worker Memory threshold value that's fixed against https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649799 in https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/4925

~Harpreet


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.