Bug 1652852 - "gluster volume get" doesn't show real default value for server.tcp-user-timeout
Summary: "gluster volume get" doesn't show real default value for server.tcp-user-timeout
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: glusterd
Version: mainline
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Xavi Hernandez
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-11-23 10:03 UTC by Xavi Hernandez
Modified: 2019-03-25 16:32 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: glusterfs-6.0
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-03-25 16:32:14 UTC
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Gluster.org Gerrit 21709 0 None Merged core: create a constant for default network timeout 2018-11-24 17:20:55 UTC

Description Xavi Hernandez 2018-11-23 10:03:54 UTC
Description of problem:

When "gluster volume get" is executed on a volume with default options, the value of "server.tcp-user-timeout" is reported as "0", but its real default value is "42".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mainline


How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. gluster volume create test host:/brick
2. gluster volume get test server.tcp-user-timeout
3.

Actual results:

The value shown is "0"

Expected results:

It should show "42"


Additional info:

This happens because glusterd doesn't look for default values for options at the same places that xlators are actually using when running.

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2018-11-23 10:07:13 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/21709 (core: create a constant for default network timeout) posted (#1) for review on master by Xavi Hernandez

Comment 2 Worker Ant 2018-11-24 17:20:54 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/21709 (core: create a constant for default network timeout) posted (#1) for review on master by Xavi Hernandez

Comment 3 Shyamsundar 2019-03-25 16:32:14 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-6.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-6.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2019-March/000120.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.