Is there an appliance showing this problem? Thanks.
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/5030
New commit detected on ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/master: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/commit/9480a766800891f1c943920e8a366b4b7feabc6c commit 9480a766800891f1c943920e8a366b4b7feabc6c Author: Milan Zazrivec <mzazrivec> AuthorDate: Mon Dec 3 06:53:11 2018 -0500 Commit: Milan Zazrivec <mzazrivec> CommitDate: Mon Dec 3 06:53:11 2018 -0500 Fix CatalogItem tree_select() https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652858 app/controllers/catalog_controller.rb | 3 +- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commit detected on ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/hammer: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/commit/7832f1ac41f7dc99d3eacafc182d41ad94afd192 commit 7832f1ac41f7dc99d3eacafc182d41ad94afd192 Author: Martin Hradil <himdel> AuthorDate: Wed Dec 5 08:12:05 2018 -0500 Commit: Martin Hradil <himdel> CommitDate: Wed Dec 5 08:12:05 2018 -0500 Merge pull request #5030 from mzazrivec/fix_catalog_item_tree_select Fix CatalogItem tree_select() (cherry picked from commit 14e3c7f7d744d762e862494663b35aa1676e5b6b) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652858 app/controllers/catalog_controller.rb | 3 +- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/5096
New commit detected on ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/master: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/commit/ac07b693509bea583c35cb6b15108cfecc3a5887 commit ac07b693509bea583c35cb6b15108cfecc3a5887 Author: Milan Zazrivec <mzazrivec> AuthorDate: Mon Dec 17 09:20:16 2018 -0500 Commit: Milan Zazrivec <mzazrivec> CommitDate: Mon Dec 17 09:20:16 2018 -0500 Fix CatalogItem tree_select() Make the fix work for reload as well. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652858 app/controllers/catalog_controller.rb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commit detected on ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/hammer: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/commit/2a97bd755614beb033e190963bc879727d50e8a7 commit 2a97bd755614beb033e190963bc879727d50e8a7 Author: Martin Hradil <himdel> AuthorDate: Wed Dec 19 10:31:56 2018 -0500 Commit: Martin Hradil <himdel> CommitDate: Wed Dec 19 10:31:56 2018 -0500 Merge pull request #5096 from mzazrivec/fix_catalog_item_tree_select_2 Fix CatalogItem tree_select() (cherry picked from commit 7135d3f1cc850aee6ea255b126034c92f8007130) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652858 app/controllers/catalog_controller.rb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Previous comment did not request any information, so I'm cancelling the needinfo here.
Needinfo in bugzilla is meant to be used to request information, not to alert to a failed bz. Should a bz fail verification, returning the status back to ASSIGNED with an explainig comment makes it perfectly clear, it has worked for ages and it still does. Matter of fact, setting needinfo in that situation would seem that I owe somebody some piece of information, when in fact no information was requested. That is why I made the comment #16, not because it would not be clear to me, that this bz failed the verification process at some point. I want to thank everyone who is able to honor the process.
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/5152
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/5193
New commit detected on ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/master: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/commit/97547f958ac2b13f4e94cf3dddf281448593c270 commit 97547f958ac2b13f4e94cf3dddf281448593c270 Author: Milan Zazrivec <mzazrivec> AuthorDate: Thu Jan 24 10:27:28 2019 -0500 Commit: Milan Zazrivec <mzazrivec> CommitDate: Thu Jan 24 10:27:28 2019 -0500 Fix summary screen rendering for catalog item with deleted image In this particular situation, @view would be set, which would confuse further code to render GTL instead of a summary screen. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652858 app/controllers/catalog_controller.rb | 3 +- app/views/catalog/explorer.html.haml | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:4199