Bug 165288 – Review Request: libgdamm

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 165288 - Review Request: libgdamm

Summary:	Review Request: libgdamm

Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	Package Review (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Michael Schwendt
QA Contact:	David Lawrence
Docs Contact:

URL:	http://www.gtkmm.org
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:	FE-ACCEPT
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2005-08-06 22:17 EDT by Tom "spot" Callaway
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-08-13 16:51:39 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Updated Spec file (1.59 KB, text/plain) 2005-08-11 11:55 EDT, Tom "spot" Callaway	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Tom "spot" Callaway 2005-08-06 22:17:55 EDT

Spec Name or Url:
http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/libgdamm.spec

SRPM Name or Url: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/libgdamm-1.3.7-1.src.rpm

Description: C++ wrappers for libgda. libgdamm is part of gnomemm - the C++
interface to the GTK+ GUI library.

This package was requested to help clear the path for glom. The spec is pretty typical for a gtk lib. 

Thanks in advance.

Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2005-08-06 23:27:36 EDT

libgdamm-devel "Requires: glibmm24-devel" because of C++ header contents
and "Requires: libgda-devel" because of pkg-config file dependencies.

Generic INSTALL file in %doc is of no interest to package users.

README in %doc is 24 bytes and pretty much useless (unless you insist
on packaging it because it _may_ change in the future).

--enable-docs doesn't do anything.

Both package descriptions are confusing, IMHO. I don't think "libgdamm
is part of gnomemm" (=> libgnomemm26 in Extras). It is "part of a set of
powerful C++ bindings for the GNOME libraries, which provide additional 
functionality above GTK+/gtkmm".

In -devel summary and description I usually add the information that
"libraries" are included, too.

Comment 2 Tom "spot" Callaway 2005-08-11 11:55:58 EDT

Created attachment 117652 [details]
Updated Spec file

This updated spec makes the changes that you've pointed out. :)

Comment 3 Michael Schwendt 2005-08-11 12:47:21 EDT

Right. Approved.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.