Bug 1652944 - Review Request: simbody - Multi-body dynamics and physics library
Summary: Review Request: simbody - Multi-body dynamics and physics library
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: NotReady
Depends On:
Blocks: 1652916
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-11-23 16:17 UTC by Till Hofmann
Modified: 2018-11-26 22:31 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Till Hofmann 2018-11-23 16:17:54 UTC
Spec URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/simbody/simbody.spec
SRPM URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/simbody/simbody-3.6.1-1.fc28.src.rpm
Description:
Simbody is a high-performance, open-source toolkit for science- and
engineering-quality simulation of articulated mechanisms, including
bio-mechanical structures such as human and animal skeletons, mechanical
systems like robots, vehicles, and machines, and anything else that can be
described as a set of rigid bodies interconnected by joints, influenced by
forces and motions, and restricted by constraints.

Fedora Account System Username: thofmann

simbody is required by gazebo >= 9.

Comment 1 Till Hofmann 2018-11-23 16:19:28 UTC
Marking as NotReady as I'm waiting for upstream feedback on:
- https://github.com/simbody/simbody/issues/658
- https://github.com/simbody/simbody/issues/659

Comment 2 Rich Mattes 2018-11-24 22:28:43 UTC
FYI I made some attempts to package this a while ago, and found some issues regarding sse enablement, bundling Ipopt, etc

For reference, my most recent attempt is at:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@robotics-sig/gazebo-latest/fedora-26-x86_64/00592039-simbody/

Comment 3 Robert-André Mauchin 2018-11-25 17:01:34 UTC
 - The summary seems wrong here:

%package        visualizer
Summary:        Development files for %{name}

Comment 4 Artur Iwicki 2018-11-26 22:31:29 UTC
Do the docs contain any binaries? If not, they should be marked as "BuildArch: noarch".


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.