+ This bug was similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045871 + Description of problem: When trying to download x86_64 packages and explicitly using --archlist=x86_64 it also downloads i686 packages. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): yum-utils-1.1.31-45.el7.noarch yum-3.4.3-158.el7.centos.noarch How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download packages from @core, specific packages error: $ yumdownloader --archlist=x86_64 \ btrfs-progs \ glibc \ iptables \ libsysfs \ parted \ procps-ng \ sg3_utils-libs \ util-linux \ xfsprogs 2. See the output 3. $ ls | grep i686 Actual results: All packages for i686 and x86_64 $ ls -1 btrfs-progs-4.9.1-1.el7.i686.rpm btrfs-progs-4.9.1-1.el7.x86_64.rpm glibc-2.17-222.el7.i686.rpm glibc-2.17-222.el7.x86_64.rpm iptables-1.4.21-24.1.el7_5.i686.rpm iptables-1.4.21-24.1.el7_5.x86_64.rpm libsysfs-2.1.0-16.el7.i686.rpm libsysfs-2.1.0-16.el7.x86_64.rpm parted-3.1-29.el7.i686.rpm parted-3.1-29.el7.x86_64.rpm procps-ng-3.3.10-17.el7_5.2.i686.rpm procps-ng-3.3.10-17.el7_5.2.x86_64.rpm sg3_utils-libs-1.37-12.el7.i686.rpm sg3_utils-libs-1.37-12.el7.x86_64.rpm util-linux-2.23.2-52.el7_5.1.i686.rpm util-linux-2.23.2-52.el7_5.1.x86_64.rpm xfsprogs-4.5.0-15.el7.i686.rpm xfsprogs-4.5.0-15.el7.x86_64.rpm Expected results: Only packages for x86_64 $ ls -1 btrfs-progs-4.9.1-1.el7.x86_64.rpm glibc-2.17-222.el7.x86_64.rpm iptables-1.4.21-24.1.el7_5.x86_64.rpm libsysfs-2.1.0-16.el7.x86_64.rpm parted-3.1-29.el7.x86_64.rpm procps-ng-3.3.10-17.el7_5.2.x86_64.rpm sg3_utils-libs-1.37-12.el7.x86_64.rpm util-linux-2.23.2-52.el7_5.1.x86_64.rpm xfsprogs-4.5.0-15.el7.x86_64.rpm
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle. Changing version to '31'.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle. Changing version to 31.
This is expected; i686 is compatible with x86_64 and therefore is downloaded alongside. For details, see this reply in the other bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045871#c2