Bug 1654747 - Please consider using progressbar2
Summary: Please consider using progressbar2
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-bitmath
Version: 31
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tim Bielawa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2018-11-29 15:14 UTC by Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)
Modified: 2019-08-13 19:39 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)

System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github https://github.com/tbielawa bitmath issues 85 None None None 2018-11-29 15:46:52 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla 1218533 None NEW use new forked progressbar2? 2018-12-18 21:02:52 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla 1648728 None ASSIGNED Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations 2018-12-18 21:02:52 UTC

Internal Links: 1218533 1648728

Description Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2018-11-29 15:14:23 UTC
python-progressbar2 is a much better maintained, more featured fork of progressbar which had gone inactive in the past. Would it please be possible to use this new one instead? That way Fedora can provide a single progressbar package instead of two that conflict (they both provide the progressbar module).

Please see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218533 


Comment 1 Tim Bielawa 2018-11-29 15:46:53 UTC
Thanks for reaching out, Ankur.

You're right, the progressbar module availability in Fedora is messy right now. I'll have to see how well that fits into the EPEL universe, as well. I'll try to take a look at this soon, but I can't promise when.

Most likely this will be a breaking change so I'll have to be careful with how it's done.

I'll post updates when I have a chance!

Comment 2 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2018-12-19 19:00:32 UTC

Just thought I'd let you know that progressbar2 is now available in rawhide. We're not building for F28/F29 just yet.


Comment 3 Ben Cotton 2019-08-13 17:00:47 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle.
Changing version to '31'.

Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2019-08-13 19:39:08 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle.
Changing version to 31.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.