Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1655593

Summary:	Download only forbidden by vdsmupgrade yum plugin
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	Radek Duda <rduda>
Component:	vdsm	Assignee:	Marcin Sobczyk <msobczyk>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Petr Kubica <pkubica>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	4.2.8	CC:	lleistne, lsurette, mperina, mtessun, srevivo, ycui
Target Milestone:	ovirt-4.4.0
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	rhv-4.4.0-29	Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-04-16 10:36:58 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Infra	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Radek Duda 2018-12-03 13:53:39 UTC

Description of problem:
If I choose to only download vdsm* packages (e.i. not to install) while QEMU processes are running, the packages are not downloaded with resulting messsage: 'Running QEMU processes found, cannot upgrade Vdsm.'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
vdsm.x86_64 0:4.20.43-1.el7ev

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum update vdsm while qemu-kvm is running
 - some vdsm* packages are going to be updated, but..
2. hit 'd' when prompt 'Is this ok [y/d/N]:' appears, so that those packages are set to be downloaded only


Actual results:
Fails to download vdsm packages with message:
'Running QEMU processes found, cannot upgrade Vdsm.'


Expected results:
Vdsm packages are downloaded.

Comment 2 RHV bug bot 2019-10-22 17:25:59 UTC

WARN: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops

Comment 3 RHV bug bot 2019-10-22 17:39:07 UTC

WARN: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops

Comment 4 RHV bug bot 2019-10-22 17:46:23 UTC

WARN: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops

Comment 5 RHV bug bot 2019-10-22 18:02:11 UTC

WARN: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops

Comment 6 RHV bug bot 2019-11-19 11:53:24 UTC

WARN: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops

Comment 7 RHV bug bot 2019-11-19 12:03:26 UTC

WARN: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status wasn't changed from MODIFIED to ON_QA due to the following reason:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops

Comment 8 RHV bug bot 2019-12-13 13:16:46 UTC

WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops

Comment 9 RHV bug bot 2019-12-20 17:46:10 UTC

WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops

Comment 10 RHV bug bot 2020-01-08 14:50:28 UTC

WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops

Comment 11 RHV bug bot 2020-01-08 15:18:46 UTC

WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops

Comment 12 RHV bug bot 2020-01-24 19:52:09 UTC

WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:

[Found non-acked flags: '{}', ]

For more info please contact: rhv-devops

Comment 15 Lukas Svaty 2020-04-16 10:36:58 UTC

Closing low severity bugs, based on QE capacity, if you would like to still verify this issue please reopen.