RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1656917 - backport change to support Fedora 29 Silverblue
Summary: backport change to support Fedora 29 Silverblue
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: osinfo-db
Version: 8.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.0
Assignee: Fabiano Fidêncio
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1656914
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-12-06 16:18 UTC by Micah Abbott
Modified: 2020-12-20 08:25 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: osinfo-db-20181011-8.el8
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1656914
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-06-14 01:04:29 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Fabiano Fidêncio 2018-12-06 17:56:39 UTC
Steps to test:
- Download both Fedora28[0] and Fedora29[1] Silverblue;
- Use GNOME Boxes to perform an express installation of those medias;

- Before the patch:
  - Silverblue 28 should be installed without any issue
  - Silverblue 29 should error out as shown here[2]

- After the patch
  - Both Silverblue 28 and 29 should be installed without any issue

[0]: https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/28/AtomicWorkstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-AtomicWorkstation-ostree-x86_64-28-1.1.iso 
[1]: https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/29/Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-29-1.2.iso
[2]: https://pagure.io/teamsilverblue/issue/29#comment-544623

Comment 2 Fabiano Fidêncio 2018-12-06 18:04:34 UTC
master:
 5420829e03348bd0fd30dd28fdc86d099ebb0215


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.