Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1657783

Summary:	Rename of a file leading to stale reads
Product:	[Community] GlusterFS	Reporter:	Karthik U S <ksubrahm>
Component:	replicate	Assignee:	Karthik U S <ksubrahm>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	mainline	CC:	bugs
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	glusterfs-6.0	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-03-25 16:32:41 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1645480

Description Karthik U S 2018-12-10 12:37:55 UTC

Description of problem:
When a file is renamed it is updating the read_subcols in the inode_ctx of the file. Since rename does not change any data in the file, we should not update the read_subvols after the rename. Updating it, can lead to serving stale data for the immediate reads.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2018-12-11 11:04:48 UTC

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/21841 (cluster/afr: Do not update read_subvol in inode_ctx after rename) posted (#1) for review on master by Karthik U S

Comment 2 Worker Ant 2018-12-12 15:21:30 UTC

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/21841 (cluster/afr: Do not update read_subvol in inode_ctx after rename/link fop) posted (#4) for review on master by Karthik U S

Comment 3 Shyamsundar 2019-03-25 16:32:41 UTC

This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-6.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-6.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2019-March/000120.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/