RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1659512 - glibc: Test suite failure: posix/tst-spawn
Summary: glibc: Test suite failure: posix/tst-spawn
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Deadline: 2019-05-08
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: glibc
Version: 8.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.1
Assignee: Patsy Griffin
QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1654819 1682593
Blocks: 1684553
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-12-14 14:48 UTC by Florian Weimer
Modified: 2023-07-18 14:30 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: glibc-2.28-54.el8
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-11-05 21:29:04 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2019:3513 0 None None None 2019-11-05 21:29:24 UTC

Description Florian Weimer 2018-12-14 14:48:37 UTC
I've seen this once during an RPM build on ppc64le:

../scripts/evaluate-test.sh posix/tst-spawn $? false false > /builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.28/build-ppc64le-redhat-linux/posix/tst-spawn.test-result
/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.28/build-ppc64le-redhat-linux/posix/tst-spawn: file 2 not in right position

=====FAIL: posix/tst-spawn.out=====
error: tst-spawn.c:262: not true: WEXITSTATUS (status) == 0
error: 1 test failures
=====FAIL: posix/tst-spawn.test-result=====
FAIL: posix/tst-spawn
original exit status 1

There is an upstream patch which improves the diagnostics slightly:

commit c70271662aa53aee0c4794d480dca6d9ba3ccc3d
Author: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella>
Date:   Wed Sep 19 11:12:05 2018 -0700

    Use libsupport for tst-spawn.c
    
    No function changes is done.  Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu.
    
            * posix/tst-spawn.c (do_prepare, handle_restart, do_test):
            Use libsupport.

Maybe this will allow us to see what is going on.

The test does not seem to have file system races.  The ppc64le uses tmpfs, so maybe this is a contributing issue.

Comment 1 Florian Weimer 2018-12-14 14:51:08 UTC
Bug 1659512 comment 1 suggests that the diagnostics do not really help.  In any case, it's not architecture-specific.

Comment 2 Florian Weimer 2019-02-25 15:09:00 UTC
This was fixed upstream in this commit, I think:

commit 114f792eaea2505cd8aee02d330aad37238da6a5
Author: Stefan Liebler <stli.com>
Date:   Fri Feb 1 11:03:35 2019 +0100

    posix/tst-spawn: Fix racy tests in spawned processes.

Comment 4 Sergey Kolosov 2019-09-17 08:21:19 UTC
Verified, posix/tst-spawn passed on all architectures

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2019-11-05 21:29:04 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3513


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.