Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1659869

Summary: improvements to io-cache
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp>
Component: io-cacheAssignee: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: mainlineCC: bugs, jahernan, mpillai, shouston, ykaul
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Improvement, Performance
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-6.0 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-03-25 16:32:47 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
paper describing performance of glusterfs on ssds none

Description Raghavendra G 2018-12-17 05:28:35 UTC 
Created attachment 1514967 [details]
paper describing performance of glusterfs on ssds

Description of problem:
While working on bz 1629589,

* xavi pointed out io-cache could be the right place for current writes to update the already-read data (another one is read-ahead).
* me and xavi both found out default page-size of io-cache (128K) is too agressive and causes performance regression for random read workloads. This was also reported in the paper attached. The paper was pointed out by Shawn Houston from Red Hat. I assume the cache being referred in the paper refers to io-cache.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Raghavendra G 2018-12-17 05:30:48 UTC 
I am proposing to have 8k as the default page-size for io-cache.
Comment 2 Worker Ant 2018-12-17 05:33:05 UTC 
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/21398 (performance/io-cache: update pages with write data) posted (#4) for review on master by Raghavendra G
Comment 3 Worker Ant 2018-12-18 09:19:57 UTC 
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/21398 (performance/io-cache: update pages with write data) posted (#5) for review on master by Raghavendra G
Comment 4 Shyamsundar 2019-03-25 16:32:47 UTC 
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-6.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-6.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2019-March/000120.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/