See Also is *the* field that I used heavily for connecting related bugzillas together. Why was it removed? Bring it back. Thank you.
+1. It was most useful.
We don;t have the resources to maintain numerous similar systems, we have consolidate to ET's if there is a feature you'd like added then open and RFE for it.
I think this was meant to be the RFE. Can you please tell us what the procedure for opening an RFE is. Alternatively, can you tell us how the other system users are doing it without "see-also"?
(In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #3) > I think this was meant to be the RFE. Asking for see-also to be re-added is not asking for a feature to be added to External Trackers. > Can you please tell us what the > procedure for opening an RFE is. Product: Bugzilla Component: Extensions Sub-Component: ExternalBugs > Alternatively, can you tell us how the > other system users are doing it without "see-also"? They are using External Trackers.
(In reply to Jeff Fearn from comment #4) > (In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #3) > > I think this was meant to be the RFE. > > Asking for see-also to be re-added is not asking for a feature to be added > to External Trackers. If we're being pedantic here, it still is an RFE. It's just not in the right place---so I've asked where it should be. Your comment was too cryptic for anyone not in the bugzilla development team to understand. "ET"? > > > Can you please tell us what the > > procedure for opening an RFE is. > > Product: Bugzilla > Component: Extensions > Sub-Component: ExternalBugs Thanks. > > > > Alternatively, can you tell us how the > > other system users are doing it without "see-also"? > > They are using External Trackers. Ah, now I know what "ET" means. I see "Redhat bugzilla" there already, so I guess nothing needs to be done. My other concerns seem to be brought up in the "external bug" that you've added to this bug. Thank you for the clarifications.