RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1661782 - [DDF] Ambiguity
Summary: [DDF] Ambiguity
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: 8.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
medium
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.0
Assignee: Steven J. Levine
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-12-23 09:44 UTC by Direct Docs Feedback
Modified: 2019-05-22 04:52 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-05-20 16:54:54 UTC
Type: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2018-12-23 09:44:00 UTC
Ambiguity

This makes it sound like setting resource-discovery=exclusive for a node would allow a resource to be active in that location without the cluster's knowledge, just like with "never". IIUC, "exclusive" would have the opposite effect. A resource could be active on a node that is NOT a member of the "exclusive" subset, without the cluster's knowledge.

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8-beta/html/configuring_and_managing_high_availability_clusters/assembly_determining-which-node-a-resource-runs-on-configuring-and-managing-high-availability-clusters#annotations:a488b9b7-20b3-4ee7-904a-4cd9807e4611


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.