Bug 1663264 - [RFE] rpm: Provide a way to strip binaries again if -g is specified
Summary: [RFE] rpm: Provide a way to strip binaries again if -g is specified
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rpm
Version: 7.7
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Pavlina Moravcova Varekova
QA Contact: Eva Mrakova
Marie Dolezelova
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1661512
Blocks: 1661508
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-01-03 15:21 UTC by Florian Weimer
Modified: 2019-08-06 13:11 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rpm-4.11.3-38.el7
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.New `--g-libs` option for the `find-debuginfo.sh` script This update introduces the new `--g-libs` option for the `find-debuginfo.sh` script. This new option is an alternative to previous `-g` option, which instructed the script to remove only debugging symbols from both binary and library files. The new `--g-libs` option works the same way as `-g`, but only for library files. The binary files are stripped completely.
Clone Of: 1661512
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-08-06 13:11:23 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2019:2259 None None None 2019-08-06 13:11:37 UTC

Description Florian Weimer 2019-01-03 15:21:44 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1661512 +++

glibc relied on the behavior that bug 1186563 changed: We use -g, but do not want to apply it to programs.

It looks like this will need some find-debuginfo.sh change.  (I am not interested in a hack that puts custom binaries on PATH or something like that.)

Comment 2 Florian Weimer 2019-01-03 15:24:00 UTC
Based on bug 1661508 comment 2, I don't think we can achieve what we need with just glibc spec file changes, so we need some sort extension to find-debuginfo.sh.

Comment 3 Panu Matilainen 2019-01-04 08:49:19 UTC
So maybe we should consider reverting the rpm change instead. This was accepted into rhel-7 with the assumption that it was a simle and harmless backport, but instead we have a regression on glibc.

Btw, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186563#c45 has some background on the -g thing.

Comment 4 Pavlina Moravcova Varekova 2019-01-04 12:27:07 UTC
Reverting of the patch looks as a good option.

Comment 43 errata-xmlrpc 2019-08-06 13:11:23 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:2259


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.