Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 166503
Review Request: gdl - GNU Data Language
Last modified: 2008-10-11 11:03:01 EDT
Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gdl.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gdl-0.8.10-1.src.rpm
A free IDL (Interactive Data Language) compatible incremental compiler
(ie. runs IDL programs). IDL is a registered trademark of Research
+ compiles in mock
+ no rpmlint warnings
+ license OK (GPL, matches upstream and is included in %doc)
+ spec file follows rules
+ spec files is readable
+ source matches upstream
+ %build OK
+ %clean OK
+ %files OK
+ %doc OK
- Why don't you pack the support for kdevelop?
FWIW, this package is Approved.
I'm not familiar with kdevelop. What should go where for kdevelop support?
Thanks for the review.
Most of the .kdevelop files are in:
The question is that to place it there, this package would require
kdevelop, I propose instead to place this in %doc for the time being.
Well on further thought the right think to do is to use triggers, look in
gforth spec for an example of those.
If kdevelop is present make a simbolic link between gdl.kdevelop and
Does this sounds like a plan? ;-)
How about I make a -devel package with
/usr/share/apps/kdevappwizard/importfiles/gdl.kdevelop and a Requires: kdevelop.
Are we sure that /usr/share/apps/kdevappwizard/importfiles/ is the right place
for it? I'll try to test...
Looks like the kdevelop file is for the development of the GDL language itself,
not for help with writing gdl programs. I've imported the original src.rpm into