Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1665469

Summary: (AMD SEV) Overly restrictive permissions on the /dev/sev device
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Erik Skultety <eskultet>
Component: systemdAssignee: Jan Synacek <jsynacek>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 8.0CC: eskultet, jsynacek, rbalakri, systemd-maint-list, virt-bugs, wchadwic
Target Milestone: rcFlags: rule-engine: mirror+
Target Release: 8.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1665400 Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-01-24 16:05:40 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1654309, 1665400, 1671791    

Description Erik Skultety 2019-01-11 14:04:34 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1665400 +++

Description of problem:
Libvirt reports <sev supported='no'/> even though SEV is enabled on the platform, i.e. both the cpuflags contain 'sev' and /dev/sev exists on the filesystem. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.5.0-17.module+el8+2625+db702f9d

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. enable SEV on the platform so that /dev/sev appears on the filesystem
2. install libvirt, launch libvirtd
3. run virsh domcapabilities, the output contains:
...
<sev supported='no'/>
...

Actual results:
Libvirt is unable to launch a SEV VM because it reports the feature as unsupported

Expected results:
Libvirt is able to launch a SEV VM

Additional info:
1) Going through libvirt debug logs, one can also see that the error is coming from QEMU when probing for capabilities:

debug : qemuMonitorJSONIOProcessLine:197 : Line [{"id": "libvirt-53", "error": {"class": "GenericError", "desc": "SEV feature is not available"}}]

2) Even though 1) suggests this might be a bug in QEMU, the problem are the default permissions on /dev/sev:

# ls -l /dev/sev
crw-------. 1 root root

which is a problem because when libvirt probes QEMU for capabilities, the process runs as qemu:qemu by default.

Comment 6 Jan Synacek 2019-01-15 09:54:30 UTC
See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663329.

Comment 8 Erik Skultety 2019-01-18 10:43:47 UTC
There's been a turn of events in virt (libvirt+QEMU) which resulted in me starting an upstream discussion here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2019-January/msg00630.html which means that having an udev rule for /dev/sev might actually not turn up to be a good idea. It mainly depends on the input we get from AMD developers.

Comment 9 Jan Synacek 2019-01-18 10:45:54 UTC
Ok. From systemd's point of view, the patch is trivial. Please, let us know about the final decision.

Comment 10 Erik Skultety 2019-01-24 16:05:40 UTC
Closing as WONTFIX for now, since there is a potential security risk even with a 0644 rule at the moment. This needs to be addressed in kernel first. I'll reopen in the future if necessary.