Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1665611 +++

[...]

--- Additional comment from Jakub Jelen on 2019-01-16 16:06:05 CET ---

I can reproduce the same problem. It really looks like a bug in crypto policy. I probably initially forgot to include the sha2 variants (they are not listed in `ssh -Q key`). Even though the log says it is plain rsa certificate, when I dumped what is actually being compared to what, I figured out it is really the SHA2 signature already, which was missing in the list from the crypto policy.

userauth_pubkey: pkalg=<rsa-sha2-512-cert-v01> PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes=<rsa-sha2-256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256-cert-v01,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384-cert-v01,rsa-sha2-512,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521-cert-v01,ssh-ed25519,ssh-ed25519-cert-v01,ssh-rsa,ssh-rsa-cert-v01> [preauth]

I filled the following pull request resolving this upstream:

https://gitlab.com/redhat-crypto/fedora-crypto-policies/merge_requests/35

And I reassign the bug to crypto policies.

I do not think this is that common. Also I do not see it would "lock out" someone unexpectedly. It would not work from start. For that reason I think this can be safely postponed to 8.1.

Verified via CI: https://baseos-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/ci-openstack/29584//console

[10.0.132.116        ] T:       4 [OS/openssh/Sanity/public-key-authentication] Running
[10.0.132.116        ] 1562575718 [Setup                                      ] PASS Score: 0
[10.0.132.116        ] 1562575719 [ng-user-certificates-with-SHA-256-signature] PASS Score: 0
[10.0.132.116        ] 1562575720 [ng-user-certificates-with-SHA-512-signature] PASS Score: 0
[10.0.132.116        ] 1562575721 [o-for-user-certificate-with-SHA-2-signature] PASS Score: 0
[10.0.132.116        ] 1562575722 [ng-host-certificates-with-SHA-256-signature] PASS Score: 0
[10.0.132.116        ] 1562575723 [Cleanup                                    ] PASS Score: 0

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3644