Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1667090

Summary: errors in knet link list validation
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Tomas Jelinek <tojeline>
Component: pcsAssignee: Tomas Jelinek <tojeline>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: cluster-qe <cluster-qe>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 8.0CC: cfeist, cluster-maint, idevat, mlisik, nhostako, omular, tojeline
Target Milestone: rcFlags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: pcs-0.10.1-6.el8 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: User enters options for more links than how many is defined by nodes' addresses or uses a linknumber which does not match any defined link in pcs cluster setup command. Consequence: Pcs sets up a cluster anyway or reports misleading errors. Fix: Links related validation in pcs including resulting error messages has been fixed. Result: Pcs validates links and linknumbers correctly and reports correctly worded errors.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-11-05 20:39:40 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1682129    
Bug Blocks: 1667058    
Attachments:
Description Flags
proposed fix + tests none

Description Tomas Jelinek 2019-01-17 12:25:43 UTC
Description of problem:
Several issues have been found in knet link list validation.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pcs-0.10.1-2.el8


How reproducible:
always, easily


Steps to Reproduce:
A) pcs cluster setup test rh80-node3 addr=192.168.122.203 transport knet link linknumber=0 link linknumber=1
B) pcs cluster setup test rh80-node3 addr=192.168.122.203 transport knet link linknumber=0 link linknumber=1 link linknumber=2


Actual results:
A) A new cluster is successfully created.
B)
Error: '2' is not a valid linknumber value, use 0..1
Error: Cannot set 3 links, knet transport supports up to 2 links
Error: Errors have occurred, therefore pcs is unable to continue


Expected results:
A) A cluster should have not been created as number of specified links exceeds number of specified addresses of each node.
B)
> Error: '2' is not a valid linknumber value, use 0..1
Not true, linknumber can be 0..7
> Error: Cannot set 3 links, knet transport supports up to 2 links
Not true, knet transport supports up to 8 links.
An error message saying number of specified links exceeds number of specified addresses of each node is missing.

Comment 2 Tomas Jelinek 2019-02-27 12:51:40 UTC
Another issue:

pcs cluster setup test rh80-node3 addr=192.168.122.203 addr=192.168.123.203 transport knet link linknumber=0 link linknumber=6

This should exit with an error saying it is not possible to configure link 6 when there are only two links specified.

Comment 3 Tomas Jelinek 2019-03-01 09:54:35 UTC
Created attachment 1539780 [details]
proposed fix + tests

After fix:

[root@rh80-node1:~]# pcs cluster setup test rh80-node3 addr=192.168.122.203 addr=192.168.123.203 transport knet link linknumber=0 link linknumber=6 link linknumber=8
Error: Cannot set options for non-existent link '6', 2 links are defined starting with link 0
Error: '8' is not a valid linknumber value, use 0..7
Error: Cannot specify options for more links (3) than how many is defined by number of addresses per node (2)
Error: Errors have occurred, therefore pcs is unable to continue
[root@rh80-node1:]# echo $?
1

Comment 4 Ondrej Mular 2019-05-02 12:05:47 UTC
After fix:
[root@rhel81-node1 ~]# rpm -q pcs
pcs-0.10.1-6.el8.x86_64

[root@rhel81-node1 ~]# pcs cluster setup test rh81-1 addr=192.168.122.203 addr=192.168.123.203 transport knet link linknumber=0 link linknumber=6 link linknumber=8
Error: Cannot set options for non-existent link '6', 2 links are defined starting with link 0
Error: '8' is not a valid linknumber value, use 0..7
Error: Cannot specify options for more links (3) than how many is defined by number of addresses per node (2)
Error: Errors have occurred, therefore pcs is unable to continue
[root@rhel81-node1 ~]# echo $?
1

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2019-11-05 20:39:40 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:3311