Bug 166823 - Latest update of gaim missing some emoticons files
Latest update of gaim missing some emoticons files
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gaim (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
medium Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Warren Togami
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-08-26 01:59 EDT by root
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:07 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-08-26 02:02:15 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description root 2005-08-26 01:59:00 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050721 CentOS/1.0.6-1.4.1.centos4 Firefox/1.0.6

Description of problem:
The latest update of the gaim package is incomplete in that it does not include some of the emoticon files that were in the previous version. It seems to be mainly the MSN emoticon files that are missing.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.up2date -u
2.start gaim
3.many emoticons not present

Actual Results:  Only a few emoticons were available

Expected Results:  All the emoticons should have been available as in the previous version

Additional info:
Comment 1 Warren Togami 2005-08-26 02:02:15 EDT
This was done intentionally as a short-term solution for warranty issues.
Comment 2 root 2005-08-26 02:05:41 EDT
Can you explain a bit more? what's a 'warranty issue' WRT Gaim? will the icons
be re-included in later versions?
Comment 3 Warren Togami 2005-08-26 02:18:11 EDT
I did say "short-term".  I cannot give any more details, nor do I have any
responsibility toward CentOS.
Comment 4 root 2005-08-26 02:25:40 EDT
I didn't say anything about Centos?? I cut and pasted that package name out of
the RHN site for the Gaim package on RHEL4. Its not a big problem but I was just
curious as to why its been changed when the gaim people haven't changed anything
in their souce code release. Oh well I'll just wait for the next update and see
what happens.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.