Bug 1672012 - clang $(llvm-config --cflags) doesn't work
Summary: clang $(llvm-config --cflags) doesn't work
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: clang
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tom Stellard
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-02-03 05:11 UTC by Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio)
Modified: 2019-02-18 02:04 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-02-18 02:04:12 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) 2019-02-03 05:11:00 UTC
Description of problem:

The following command doesn't succeed on rawhide:

$ echo "int main() {}" | clang $(llvm-config --cflags) -x c -

It fails with:

clang-7: error: unknown argument: '-fstack-clash-protection'

I assume this is because llvm has been compiled with gcc, and using gcc instead of clang works. But it's a bit surprising being forced to compile clang plugins with gcc.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): clang version 7.0.1 (Fedora 7.0.1-2.fc30)


How reproducible: Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. See above.

Actual results: Fails as described above.

Expected results: Succeeds, and generates an executable that does nothing.

Comment 1 serge_sans_paille 2019-02-03 09:19:05 UTC
> I assume this is because llvm has been compiled with gcc, and using gcc instead of clang works.

Exactly. @tstellar, maybe clang should just issue a warning for this specific flag, instead of throwing an error?

Comment 2 Tom Stellard 2019-02-04 17:15:51 UTC
This has been fixed upstream in LLVM by https://reviews.llvm.org/rL349068.

Comment 3 serge_sans_paille 2019-02-04 17:25:39 UTC
Great. Should we backport it to llvm-7 then?

Comment 4 Tom Stellard 2019-02-04 17:28:09 UTC
Yes, let's backport it.

Comment 5 Tom Stellard 2019-02-09 04:09:19 UTC
I'll take this one.

Comment 6 Tom Stellard 2019-02-12 20:30:43 UTC
Submitted PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/llvm/pull-request/9

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2019-02-15 17:04:12 UTC
llvm-7.0.1-3.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b2152f77e0

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2019-02-16 03:05:17 UTC
llvm-7.0.1-3.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b2152f77e0

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2019-02-18 02:04:12 UTC
llvm-7.0.1-3.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.