Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
On RHEL7.6 systems, the xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_rsyslog_files_groupownership fule fails claiming that the group for the rsyslog log files (in /var/log) have not expected group.
On Red Hat systems, the group is supposed to be "root" (0) by default.
# oscap xccdf eval --fetch-remote-resources --report report.html --profile xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_profile_pci-dss --rule xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_rsyslog_files_groupownership /usr/share/xml/scap/ssg/content/ssg-rhel7-ds.xml
Downloading: https://www.redhat.com/security/data/oval/com.redhat.rhsa-RHEL7.xml.bz2 ... ok
Title Ensure Log Files Are Owned By Appropriate Group
Rule xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_rsyslog_files_groupownership
Ident CCE-80190-2
Result fail
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
scap-security-guide-0.1.40-12.el7.noarch
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Execute the rule on a RHEL 7.6 system
Actual results:
Result fail
Expected results:
Result pass
Additional info:
Changing the group to "adm" (4) fixes the issue:
# chgrp 4 $(perl -n -e 'm#^[^(\s|\#|\$)]+[\s]+.*[\s]+-?(/+[^:;\s]+);*.*$# && print "$1\n"' /etc/rsyslog.conf /etc/rsyslog.d/* )
# ls -l $(perl -n -e 'm#^[^(\s|\#|\$)]+[\s]+.*[\s]+-?(/+[^:;\s]+);*.*$# && print "$1\n"' /etc/rsyslog.conf /etc/rsyslog.d/* )
-rw-------. 2 root adm 14747 Feb 8 14:21 /var/log/boot.log
-rw-------. 1 root adm 16913 Feb 8 14:30 /var/log/cron
-rw-------. 1 root adm 2124 Feb 8 14:21 /var/log/maillog
-rw-------. 1 root adm 671797 Feb 8 14:36 /var/log/messages
-rw-------. 1 root adm 17487 Feb 8 14:25 /var/log/secure
-rw-------. 1 root adm 0 Jan 31 11:18 /var/log/spooler
# oscap xccdf eval --fetch-remote-resources --report report.html --profile xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_profile_pci-dss --rule xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_rsyslog_files_groupownership /usr/share/xml/scap/ssg/content/ssg-rhel7-ds.xml
Downloading: https://www.redhat.com/security/data/oval/com.redhat.rhsa-RHEL7.xml.bz2 ... ok
Title Ensure Log Files Are Owned By Appropriate Group
Rule xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_rsyslog_files_groupownership
Ident CCE-80190-2
Result pass
Looking at the source code (shared/checks/oval/rsyslog_files_groupownership.xml), we can see that the "state_rsyslog_files_groupownership" state compares against Ubuntu/Debian and the rest of the world:
95 <unix:file_state id="state_rsyslog_files_groupownership" version="1">
96 <unix:type operation="equals">regular</unix:type>
97 {{% if product in ["debian8", "ubuntu1404", "ubuntu1604"] %}}
98 <unix:group_id datatype="int">0</unix:group_id>
99 {{% else %}}
100 <unix:group_id datatype="int">4</unix:group_id>
101 {{% endif %}}
102 </unix:file_state>
I don't know how Ubuntu/Debian expects, probably the if/else/endif has to be inverted (RHEL expects "0", and Ubuntu/Debian probably "4").
Comment 2Watson Yuuma Sato
2019-02-11 09:11:27 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1657701 ***