Spec Name or Url: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Hook-LexWrap.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Hook-LexWrap-0.20-1.src.rpm Description: Hook::LexWrap allows you to install a pre- or post-wrapper (or both) around an existing subroutine. Unlike other modules that provide this capacity (e.g. Hook::PreAndPost and Hook::WrapSub), Hook::LexWrap implements wrappers in such a way that the standard `caller' function works correctly within the wrapped subroutine. Note: This package is an RT 3.4 requirement
APPROVED
Package still has redundant BR: perl and does not include text of either GPL or Artistic license.
(In reply to comment #2) > Package still has redundant BR: perl and does not include text of either GPL or > Artistic license I read this as a formal veto. Therefore, I am assigning the package to Paul, and push it back to FE-REVIEW.
I have no plans of adding license files not include in the source tarball. People installing only the binary RPMS won't be able to know if they were added by the author or by a third party, and I don't want to induce someone in error if I make mistakes (shipping incomplete license info, placing the wrong license, ...). So as of this moment I am also stopping updating/reviewing/approving packages.
CVS devel branch: Added a comment about the license files location to the specfile.
This package now meets the updated policy. Approved.
Thanks.
(In reply to comment #6) > This package now meets the updated policy. Approved. Which updated policy? I haven't seen anything on -maintainers or fedora-extras-list, nor have the package review guidelines been updated. What did I miss?
Paul, The temporary [1] policy update was only posted to the FESCO mailling list. /jpo [1] - We are still waiting for Legal feedback.