Hide Forgot
digikam failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f30 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32376440 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild Please fix digikam at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, digikam will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 31, digikam will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source
Created attachment 1529708 [details] build.log file build.log too big, will only attach last 1024 bytes
Created attachment 1529709 [details] root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 1024 bytes
Created attachment 1529710 [details] state.log
This will be resolved once digikam 6 comes to rawhide. Blocking issue is that digikam-6 sources no longer includes kipi-plugins, upstream ml discussion ongoing: https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/2019-February/101660.html
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1216367
Arg, now hit a ppc64le specific issue, filed bug upstream, https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404853
FTBFS is arch-limited, updating summary. Going with ExcludeArch for now, until we have something better and/or feedback from upstream
Resetting back to FTBFS on f30 to use for freeze exception
digikam-6.0.0-5.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-99fba7aceb
Proposed as a Freeze Exception for 30-beta by Fedora user rdieter using the blocker tracking app because: fix FTBFS
digikam-6.0.0-5.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-99fba7aceb
Well, this isn't really just an FTBFS fix - it's a new version. In stable right now is 5.9.0, so granted this an FE effectively is granting an FE to update the package to 6.0.0. Is 5.9.0 badly broken or uninstallable?
5.9.0 is uninstallable due to broken dependencies
Discussed during the 2019-03-11 blocker review meeting: [1] The decision to classify this bug as an "AcceptedFreezeException" was made on the grounds that since the existing package cannot be installed due to broken dependencies, we accept this as an FE (fixing broken dependencies in the stable package set is usually a good idea). [1] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2019-03-11/f30-blocker-review.2019-03-11-16.04.txt
digikam-6.0.0-5.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.